[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14736466#comment-14736466
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1824:
--------------------------------------
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/743#discussion_r39019222
--- Diff:
tajo-core-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/master/TestNonForwardQueryResultSystemScanner.java
---
@@ -38,4 +47,20 @@ public void testGetNextRowsForTable() throws Exception {
public void testGetClusterDetails() throws Exception {
assertQueryStr("SELECT TYPE FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.CLUSTER");
}
+
--- End diff --
I think that this test is not necessary.
> Remove partition_keys table from information_schema
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-1824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1824
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Catalog
> Reporter: Jaehwa Jung
> Assignee: Jaehwa Jung
> Fix For: 0.11.0, 0.12.0
>
> Attachments: TAJO-1824.patch
>
>
> Selecting partition keys is not necessary because partitions are searched
> with its partition name. It would be better to remove from information_schema.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
