[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14908645#comment-14908645
]
David Chen commented on TAJO-1461:
----------------------------------
My apologies, I actually have a patch ready for this but got side-tracked by
other work.
I'll rebase my patch tonight then run it through our internal patch review. I
should have it posted sometime early next week.
> Follow Protocol Buffer Style Guide
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-1461
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1461
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Chen
> Assignee: David Chen
> Priority: Minor
>
> Similar to HBASE-8915, many of Tajo's Protocol Buffer definitions follow Java
> conventions (i.e. {{camelCase}} field names) rather than the convention
> described in the Protocol Buffers Style Guide:
> https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/style
> Since we have been discussing improving portability of Tajo's service
> interfaces (TAJO-1331, TAJO-1458), it would be good to conform to the
> Protocol Buffers Style Guide.
> For the most part, this is not a difficult change and for the most part would
> not result in much change in the generated Java code since the proto compiler
> will automatically convert {{field_name}} to {{getFieldName}} for the
> generated Java classes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
