[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292980#comment-15292980
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-2154:
--------------------------------------

Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1017#discussion_r64004326
  
    --- Diff: tajo-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/type/Bit.java ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.tajo.type;
    +
    +import static org.apache.tajo.common.TajoDataTypes.Type.BIT;
    +
    +public class Bit extends Type {
    +  public Bit() {
    --- End diff --
    
    I got your point. I misunderstood your comment. I'll change them. Thank you!


> Refactor Datum to use new Type implementation
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-2154
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2154
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Data Type
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Hyunsik Choi
>             Fix For: 0.12.0
>
>
> See TAJO-2042. The main objective of this issue is to refactor all Datum 
> implementation to use new Type implementation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to