[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16927335#comment-16927335
 ] 

Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-1925:
------------------------------------

I rescheduled this issue to 0.13.0.

> Improve hive compatibility with TIMESTAMP partition column.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1925
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1925
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Catalog, Physical Operator
>    Affects Versions: 0.11.0, 0.12.0
>            Reporter: Jaehwa Jung
>            Assignee: Hyunsik Choi
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.13.0
>
>         Attachments: TAJO-1925.patch, TAJO-1925_2.patch, TAJO-1925_3.patch
>
>
> -Currently, Tajo allow to use TIMESTAMP column as a partition key. But if 
> users use TIMESTAMP partition column, Tajo doesn't keep the original 
> TIMESTAMP values. Actually, Tajo automatically converts TIMESTAMP values to 
> STRING literals which are accepted in the format YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS. As a 
> result, Tajo can't keep mills of second and can't provide right hive 
> compatibility-
> We need to support hive compatibility for all partition column types. But 
> when using TIMESTAMP partition column, users might not get correct partitions 
> occasionally because tajo partition name is different from hive partition 
> name. Actually, Tajo automatically converts TIMESTAMP values to STRING 
> literals which are accepted in the format YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS. But Hive 
> automatically converts it to STRING literals which are accepted in the format 
> YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS.MS. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

Reply via email to