[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13923820#comment-13923820
 ] 

Hudson commented on TAJO-672:
-----------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Tajo-0.8.0-build #17 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Tajo-0.8.0-build/17/])
TAJO-672: Wrong progress status when overwrites to partition table. 
(hyoungjunkim via hyunsik) (hyunsik: 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/?p=incubator-tajo.git&a=commit&h=8cf31be82a87e4a0ca828e363487fc070f83086c)
* 
tajo-core/tajo-core-backend/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java
* CHANGES.txt
* tajo-core/tajo-core-backend/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java


> Wrong progress status when overwrites to partition table
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-672
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-672
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: data shuffle
>    Affects Versions: 0.8-incubating, 1.0-incubating
>            Reporter: hyoungjunkim
>            Assignee: hyoungjunkim
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 0.8-incubating, 1.0-incubating
>
>         Attachments: TAJO-672.patch
>
>
> I ran next query in cli. Progress is over 100% and then down to 97%. But 
> finally finished at 100%.
> {code}
> create table orders_partition (
> o_orderkey      INT8,
> o_custkey       INT8,
> o_orderstatus   TEXT,
> o_totalprice    FLOAT8,
> o_orderdate     TEXT,
> o_orderpriority TEXT,
> o_clerk TEXT,
> o_shippriority  INT4,
> o_comment       TEXT)
> partition by column (o_year text, o_month text);
> insert overwrite into orders_partition 
> select o_orderkey, o_custkey, o_orderstatus, o_totalprice, 
> o_orderdate, o_orderpriority, o_clerk, o_shippriority, o_comment, 
> substr(o_orderdate, 1, 4), substr(o_orderdate , 6, 2) 
> from orders;
> {code}
> {code}
> Progress: 95%, response time: 73.572 sec
> Progress: 95%, response time: 74.573 sec
> Progress: 95%, response time: 75.574 sec
> Progress: 96%, response time: 76.576 sec
> Progress: 96%, response time: 77.578 sec
> Progress: 96%, response time: 78.58 sec
> Progress: 100%, response time: 79.581 sec
> Progress: 100%, response time: 80.582 sec
> Progress: 101%, response time: 81.584 sec
> Progress: 101%, response time: 82.586 sec
> Progress: 101%, response time: 83.587 sec
> Progress: 101%, response time: 84.589 sec
> Progress: 101%, response time: 85.591 sec
> Progress: 101%, response time: 86.593 sec
> Progress: 102%, response time: 87.595 sec
> Progress: 102%, response time: 88.596 sec
> Progress: 102%, response time: 89.598 sec
> Progress: 102%, response time: 90.601 sec
> Progress: 102%, response time: 91.603 sec
> Progress: 102%, response time: 92.605 sec
> Progress: 102%, response time: 93.607 sec
> Progress: 97%, response time: 94.608 sec
> Progress: 97%, response time: 95.61 sec
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to