[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14134200#comment-14134200
 ] 

Jonathan Eagles commented on TEZ-1563:
--------------------------------------

I am ok with this short term approach, and agree with Sid that internal 
modifications should long term not be part of the client object serializations.

> TezClient.submitDAGSession alters DAG local resources regardless of DAG 
> submission
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-1563
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1563
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.5.0
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Bikas Saha
>         Attachments: TEZ-1563.1.patch, TEZ-1563.2.patch
>
>
> In {{TezClient#submitDAGSesssion(Dag)}}, a {{DAGPlan}} is created from the 
> {{DAG}} before the {{DAGClientAMProtocolBlockingPB}} is instantiated. When 
> the application isn't running, {{waitForProxy()}} will throw a 
> {{SessionNotRunning}} Exception.
> The problem is that the internal state of the {{DAG}} is modified, regardless 
> of whether the DAG is actually run or not. 
> {code}
> DAGPlan dagPlan = dag.createDag(amConfig.getTezConfiguration());
> {code}
> The {{createDag}} method will ultimately call {{addTaskLocalFiles}} for each 
> {{Vertex}} in the {{DAG}}
> {code}
> // add common task files for this DAG
> vertex.addTaskLocalFiles(commonTaskLocalFiles);
> {code}
> Because the {{DAG}}'s state is modified, {{Vertex#addTaskLocalFiles(Map)}} 
> will fail if any resources are added multiple times. As such, if the 
> application is not running and {{SessionNotRunning}} is thrown, that same DAG 
> cannot be passed in to run the DAG after the application is started again.
> Additionally, {{DAG}} is missing a getTaskLocalFiles method as compared to 
> {{Vertex}} which would be good to add to make the two classes more uniform.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to