[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14298421#comment-14298421
]
Hadoop QA commented on TEZ-993:
-------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12695488/TEZ-993-5.patch
against master revision a1c8518.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 4 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/98//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/98//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Remove application logic from RecoveryService
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEZ-993
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-993
> Project: Apache Tez
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Bikas Saha
> Assignee: Jeff Zhang
> Attachments: TEZ-993-3.patch, TEZ-993-4.patch, TEZ-993-5.patch,
> Tez-993-2.patch, Tez-993.patch
>
>
> Currently RecoveryService storage logic knows a lot about the DAG like which
> dag is pre-warm and does not need to be stored, which events needs special
> treatment etc. This kind of logic couples the DAG and the storage more than
> is probably necessary and can be a source of complications down the road. The
> storage should ideally be simply storing a sequence of arbitrary records
> delimited by a marker.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
