[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14357178#comment-14357178
 ] 

Tsuyoshi Ozawa commented on TEZ-145:
------------------------------------

{code}
+    if (hasFinalReduceStage) {
+      boolean hasHostLocalReduceStage =
+          conf.getBoolean(MRJobConfig.MRR_HOST_LOCAL_REDUCE, 
MRJobConfig.DEFAULT_MRR_HOST_LOCAL_REDUCE);
+      if (hasHostLocalReduceStage) {
+        numIntermediateStages++;
+      }
+      boolean hasRackLocalReduceStage =
+          conf.getBoolean(MRJobConfig.MRR_RACK_LOCAL_REDUCE, 
MRJobConfig.DEFAULT_MRR_RACK_LOCAL_REDUCE);
+      if (hasRackLocalReduceStage) {
+        numIntermediateStages++;
+      }
+    }
{code}

These options are not used for now.

> Support a combiner processor that can run non-local to map/reduce nodes
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-145
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-145
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hitesh Shah
>            Assignee: Tsuyoshi Ozawa
>         Attachments: WIP-TEZ-145-001.patch
>
>
> For aggregate operators that can benefit by running in multi-level trees, 
> support of being able to run a combiner in a non-local mode would allow 
> performance efficiencies to be gained by running a combiner at a rack-level. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to