[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15045889#comment-15045889
]
Hitesh Shah commented on TEZ-1408:
----------------------------------
[~raviprak] Yes we could but that means we are relying on hadoop to provide the
direct dependency. Currently, the way the minimal tarball is meant to be
structured is that it should pull in all of its direct dependencies but exclude
transitive dependencies from hadoop. However, I think there are some gaps in
this approach too.
> SLF4J related warnings when using full tarball
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEZ-1408
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1408
> Project: Apache Tez
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hitesh Shah
> Attachments: TEZ-1408.001.patch
>
>
> SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
> SLF4J: Found binding in
> [jar:file:/Users/hitesh/install/hadoop2/hadoop-common-2.6.0-SNAPSHOT/share/hadoop/common/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.5.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
> SLF4J: Found binding in
> [jar:file:/Users/hitesh/install/hadoop2/tez/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.5.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an
> explanation.
> SLF4J: Actual binding is of type [org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
