[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15382803#comment-15382803
 ] 

TezQA commented on TEZ-3284:
----------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12818583/TEZ-3284.3.patch
  against master revision 55f5186.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests in :
                   org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1858//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1858//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Synchronization for every write in UnorderdKVWriter
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-3284
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3284
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0
>            Reporter: Gopal V
>            Assignee: Jonathan Eagles
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: Performance
>         Attachments: TEZ-3284.1.patch, TEZ-3284.2.patch, TEZ-3284.3.patch
>
>
> {code}
>     baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
>     dos = new DataOutputStream(baos);
>     keySerializer.open(dos);
>     valSerializer.open(dos);
> {code}
> This is a known performance issue as documented in HADOOP-10694
> Both ByteArrayOutputStream::write() and DataOutputStream::write() have lock 
> prefix calls in them, because they are object synchronized methods.
> Recommended solution is to replicate the Hive NonSync impls similar to 
> HADOOP-10694
> {code}
>  TezTaskRunner [RUNNABLE]
> *** java.io.DataOutputStream.write(byte[], int, int) DataOutputStream.java:107
> org.apache.tez.runtime.library.common.serializer.TezBytesWritableSerialization$TezBytesWritableSerializer.serialize(Writable)
>  TezBytesWritableSerialization.java:123
> org.apache.tez.runtime.library.common.serializer.TezBytesWritableSerialization$TezBytesWritableSerializer.serialize(Object)
>  TezBytesWritableSerialization.java:110
> org.apache.tez.runtime.library.common.writers.UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter.write(Object,
>  Object, int) UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter.java:295
> org.apache.tez.runtime.library.common.writers.UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter.write(Object,
>  Object) UnorderedPartitionedKVWriter.java:257
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.tez.TezProcessor$TezKVOutputCollector.collect(Object,
>  Object) TezProcessor.java:232
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.vector.reducesink.VectorReduceSinkCommonOperator.collect(BytesWritable,
>  Writable) VectorReduceSinkCommonOperator.java:432
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.vector.reducesink.VectorReduceSinkCommonOperator.process(Object,
>  int) VectorReduceSinkCommonOperator.java:397
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.Operator.forward(Object, ObjectInspector) 
> Operator.java:837
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.vector.VectorSelectOperator.process(Object, 
> int) VectorSelectOperator.java:144
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.Operator.forward(Object, ObjectInspector) 
> Operator.java:837
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.vector.VectorFilterOperator.process(Object, 
> int) VectorFilterOperator.java:121
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.Operator.forward(Object, ObjectInspector) 
> Operator.java:837
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.TableScanOperator.process(Object, int) 
> TableScanOperator.java:130
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.vector.VectorMapOperator.process(Writable) 
> VectorMapOperator.java:796
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.tez.MapRecordSource.processRow(Object) 
> MapRecordSource.java:86
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.tez.MapRecordSource.pushRecord() 
> MapRecordSource.java:70
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.tez.MapRecordProcessor.run() 
> MapRecordProcessor.java:361
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.tez.TezProcessor.initializeAndRunProcessor(Map,
>  Map) TezProcessor.java:172
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.tez.TezProcessor.run(Map, Map) 
> TezProcessor.java:160
> org.apache.tez.runtime.LogicalIOProcessorRuntimeTask.run() 
> LogicalIOProcessorRuntimeTask.java:370
> org.apache.tez.runtime.task.TaskRunner2Callable$1.run() 
> TaskRunner2Callable.java:73
> org.apache.tez.runtime.task.TaskRunner2Callable$1.run() 
> TaskRunner2Callable.java:61
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(PrivilegedExceptionAction, 
> AccessControlContext) AccessController.java (native)
> javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject, PrivilegedExceptionAction) 
> Subject.java:422
> org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.doAs(PrivilegedExceptionAction)
>  UserGroupInformation.java:1657
> org.apache.tez.runtime.task.TaskRunner2Callable.callInternal() 
> TaskRunner2Callable.java:61
> org.apache.tez.runtime.task.TaskRunner2Callable.callInternal() 
> TaskRunner2Callable.java:37
> org.apache.tez.common.CallableWithNdc.call() CallableWithNdc.java:36
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run() FutureTask.java:266
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker) 
> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() 
> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617
> java.lang.Thread.run() Thread.java:745
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to