[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16047190#comment-16047190
 ] 

Rajesh Balamohan commented on TEZ-3757:
---------------------------------------

Thanks for reporting the bug [~tmwoodruff]. Due to the overflow, it would end 
up using 16 *1024 *1024 as the metasize instead of reduced metasize for larger 
items. Changing the datatype in sortSpan constructor for dataSize would fix the 
issue.

> Integer overflow in PipelinedSorter
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-3757
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3757
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.4, 0.8.5
>            Reporter: Travis Woodruff
>
> This code in {{PipelinedSorter.sort()}} passes {{(1024*1024)}} as maxItems to 
> the {{SortSpan}} constructor:
> {code}
>       //TODO: fix per item being passed.
>       span = new SortSpan((ByteBuffer)buffers.get(bufferIndex).clear(), 
> (1024*1024),
>           perItem, ConfigUtils.getIntermediateOutputKeyComparator(this.conf));
> {code}
> {{SortSpan}}'s constructor then calculates {{dataSize}} as follows:
> {code}
>       int dataSize = maxItems * perItem;
> {code}
> This means that if {{perItem}} is >= 2048, {{dataSize}} overflows, which 
> (usually?) ends up causing the capacity check to not work correctly, which 
> causes subsequent buffer operations to fail.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to