[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16796234#comment-16796234
]
TezQA commented on TEZ-3718:
----------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 4s{color}
| {color:red} TEZ-3718 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong Branch?
See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TEZ/How+to+Contribute+to+Tez
for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | TEZ-3718 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12891370/TEZ-3718.4.patch |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/128/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Better handling of 'bad' nodes
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: TEZ-3718
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3718
> Project: Apache Tez
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Siddharth Seth
> Assignee: Zhiyuan Yang
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: TEZ-3718.1.patch, TEZ-3718.2.patch, TEZ-3718.3.patch,
> TEZ-3718.4.patch
>
>
> At the moment, the default behaviour in case of a node being marked bad is to
> do nothing other than not schedule new tasks on this node.
> The alternate, via config, is to retroactively kill every task which ran on
> the node, which causes far too many unnecessary re-runs.
> Proposing the following changes.
> 1. KILL fragments which are currently in the RUNNING state (instead of
> relying on a timeout which leads to the attempt being marked as FAILED after
> the timeout interval.
> 2. Keep track of these failed nodes, and use this as input to the failure
> heuristics. Normally source tasks require multiple consumers to report
> failure for them to be marked as bad. If a single consumer reports failure
> against a source which ran on a bad node, consider it bad and re-schedule
> immediately. (Otherwise failures can take a while to propagate, and jobs get
> a lot slower).
> [~jlowe] - think you've looked at this in the past. Any thoughts/suggestions.
> What I'm seeing is retroactive failures taking a long time to apply, and
> restart sources which ran on a bad node. Also running tasks being counted as
> FAILURES instead of KILLS.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
