[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17119735#comment-17119735
]
TezQA commented on TEZ-2442:
----------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 7s{color}
| {color:red} TEZ-2442 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong Branch?
See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TEZ/How+to+Contribute+to+Tez
for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | TEZ-2442 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12803121/tez-2442-trunk.5.patch
|
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/456/console |
| versions | git=2.17.1 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.11.1 https://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Support DFS based shuffle in addition to HTTP shuffle
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEZ-2442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2442
> Project: Apache Tez
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.5.3
> Reporter: Kannan Rajah
> Assignee: shanyu zhao
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: FS_based_shuffle_v2.pdf, Tez Shuffle using DFS.pdf,
> hdfs_broadcast_hack.txt, tez-2442-trunk.2.patch, tez-2442-trunk.3.patch,
> tez-2442-trunk.4.patch, tez-2442-trunk.5.patch, tez-2442-trunk.patch,
> tez_hdfs_shuffle.patch
>
>
> In Tez, Shuffle is a mechanism by which intermediate data can be shared
> between stages. Shuffle data is written to local disk and fetched from any
> remote node using HTTP. A DFS like MapR file system can support writing this
> shuffle data directly to its DFS using a notion of local volumes and retrieve
> it using HDFS API from remote node. The current Shuffle implementation
> assumes local data can only be managed by LocalFileSystem. So it uses
> RawLocalFileSystem and LocalDirAllocator. If we can remove this assumption
> and introduce an abstraction to manage local disks, then we can reuse most of
> the shuffle logic (store, sort) and inject a HDFS API based retrieval instead
> of HTTP.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)