potiuk commented on issue #1379: URL: https://github.com/apache/tooling-trusted-releases/issues/1379#issuecomment-4919255385
> I re-read that thread and you really should learn to pay attention to Roy who write the ALv2.0 - In https://lists.apache.org/thread/0hpgcom5t5wzw999nyprb2qhw0mlyr9d he suggests that a README include the license and each source could refer back to that. Do you understand the difference? Our users are not dependent on however the SPDX people might change their interpretation of the license. Yes. That's why Roy had no concerns about accompanying SPDX with linking to the URL of full licence (which we actually have) - so I think we are fine with what Roy wrote and RAT is also OK with it. It's really not a dicussion with me - but likely wiht RAT / Roy / Legal to clarify it. I just opened an issue, but again - I do not need to get it solved- RAT check is perfectly fine for us. It's really the question whether Lightweight check agrees wit RAT. My problem is solved now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
