zrhoffman opened a new issue #5182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/5182


   <!--
   ************ STOP!! ************
   If this issue identifies a security vulnerability, DO NOT submit it! 
Instead, contact
   the Apache Traffic Control Security Team at 
[email protected] and follow the
   guidelines at https://www.apache.org/security/ regarding vulnerability 
disclosure.
   
   - For *SUPPORT QUESTIONS*, use the Traffic Control slack 
(https://s.apache.org/atc-slack)
   or Traffic Control mailing lists 
(https://trafficcontrol.apache.org/mailing_lists).
   - Before submitting, please **SEARCH GITHUB** for a similar issue or PR.
   -->
   
   ## I'm submitting a ...
   <!-- delete all those that don't apply -->
   <!--- security vulnerability (STOP!! - see above)-->
   -  bug report
   
   ## Traffic Control components affected ...
   <!-- delete all those that don't apply -->
   -  CDN in a Box
   -  Traffic Vault
   -  CI tests
   
   ## Current behavior:
   <!-- Describe how the bug manifests -->
   In CDN in a Box, Traffic Vault sometimes crashes when starting up with this 
message:
   ```erlang
   [error] <0.325.0> CRASH REPORT Process <0.325.0> with 0 neighbours crashed 
with reason: no match of right hand value {error,closed} in 
mochiweb_http:loop/2 line 56
   ```
   
   See *Anything else* for context in the logs.
   
   This affects our CI because the CDN in a Box Readiness check will sometimes 
fail due to this (after timing out after 12 minutes of attempts to contact a 
Delivery Service).
   
   ## Expected behavior:
   <!-- Describe what the behavior would be without the bug -->
   Traffic Vault should start successfully. The Traffic Vault image should 
include a health check that attempts to query the `ssl` buck and fails if it 
cannot. If we do this, we can
   * Make Traffic Vault exit when the health check fails
   * Make Traffic Vault restart when it exits
   
   which should fix this issue with an additional cost of 1-2 minutes of 
startup time when the issue occurs.
   
   ## Minimal reproduction of the problem with instructions:
   <!--
   If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the *STEPS TO REPRODUCE* and
   include the applicable TC version.
   -->
   1. Start CDN-in-a-Box and watch for that error in the Traffic Vault logs
   2. If Traffic Vault gets all the way to 
       ```erlang
       <0.2189.0>@yz_fuse:create:73 Creating fuse for search index sslkeys
      ```
      
      but the error is not there (the `sslkeys` being created does not mean the 
crash did not occur), `docker-compose restart trafficvault` and try again
      
   This error is uncommon to reproduce, so don't feel like you need to 
reproduce it to fix this issue.
   
   ## Anything else:
   <!--
   e.g. stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix (feel free to delete
   this section)
   -->
   The log is in a gist 
(https://gist.github.com/zrhoffman/58850e41d124b0a49acd3203699661d9) because 
it's 951 lines
   
   <!--
   Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
   or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
   distributed with this work for additional information
   regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
   to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
   "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
   with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
   
       https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   
   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
   software distributed under the License is distributed on an
   "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
   KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
   specific language governing permissions and limitations
   under the License.
   -->
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to