mitchell852 commented on pull request #6532: URL: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/6532#issuecomment-1028541929
> When I first started working on the Docker version of CDN-in-a-Box, this is much more what I had in mind than what we currently know as "CiaB" (although I can't speak for Dan who was working on it in some form or another before I knew what ATC was) - probably because as a developer I only had a developer's needs in mind. And that's likely why the decision was made to do things the way they currently are, with RPMs and running on CentOS and installing everything under `/opt/` etc. It's "prod-like" and that's highly valued for testing, which is a primary use-case of our current CiaB. yeah, seems there are 2 different use cases: 1. a ciab for testing where a ciab most like prod is desired (rpms, centos, etc) 2. a ciab for development (lightweight, fast build and rebuild, etc) i just worry about having to maintain the codebase of 2 ciab's. anyhow, that's for you guys to figure out. maybe there's a way to abstract out similar pieces? maybe not? i'll leave it to the experts but i think this is great and much needed for a long time. hopefully, it can help ease development of TC and encourage more code contributions from our open source community. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
