ASF GitHub Bot commented on TC-166:

Github user asfgit commented on the issue:

    Can one of the admins verify this patch?

> lastConfigCheck stat should be updated if CrConfigs have a different checksum 
> but the same timestamp
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: TC-166
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TC-166
>             Project: Traffic Control
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Traffic Router
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: David Neuman
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: crconfig
> When Traffic Router checks for a new CrConfig it first checks to see if the 
> CrConfig returned from Traffic Monitor has the same checksum as it's current 
> version, if it doesn't then Traffic Router attempts to process it.  During 
> processing, if the new CrConfig has the same timestamp as the current 
> CrConfig, Traffic Router logs and info message and returns false.  A warning 
> is then logged saying CrConfig has been rejected.  This is ok, however, the 
> lastConfigCheck stat is not updated.  Since the CrConfigs are the same, the 
> lastConfigCheck stat should be updated.
> This is basically an edge case that we came across because we are running 
> javaTM and goTM in parallel.  The lastConfigCheck stat was only being updated 
> once every other poll, which cause our alarms to go off.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

Reply via email to