[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leif Hedstrom reassigned TS-63:
-------------------------------
Assignee: Leif Hedstrom
> InkAPI uses INK_EVENT_IMMEDIATE instead of EVENT_CONT just because they are
> both 1
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-63
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-63
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: InkAPI
> Reporter: John Plevyak
> Assignee: Leif Hedstrom
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.1.2
>
>
> For some reason the InkAPI and the examples use INK_EVENT_IMMEDIATE as a
> return value
> when it should be an event argument to handleEvent. They should be using
> EVENT_CONT
> which just so happens to also be 1 but is a return value. it doesn't even
> make sense as
> INK_EVENT_IMMEDIATE is used to indicate that an eventProcessor.schedule_imm()
> has occured (hence the name) while EVENT_CONT indicates that the processor can
> call with more events as compared to EVENT_DONE which indicates that it
> shouldn't,
> perhaps because the Continuation nolonger exists.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
