[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Leif Hedstrom reassigned TS-505:
--------------------------------

    Assignee: Leif Hedstrom

> Worse performance when Origin server sends Connection: keep-alive
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-505
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-505
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network
>            Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>            Assignee: Leif Hedstrom
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.1.6
>
>
> I have a test setup using lighttpd (stock config, but with the port changed 
> to port 82, and logging disabled). I've created a small file (42 bytes) in 
> /var/www/lighttpd/cl-test.html.
> I'm running Apache TS with a stock config ("gmake install") with the 
> following configuration changes:
> records.config:
> ---------------
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.server_port INT 80
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.cache.required_headers INT 2
> CONFIG proxy.config.log2.logging_enabled INT 0
> remap.config:
> -------------
> map http://loki.ogre.com/lighttpd/  http://localhost:82/
> I'm "benchmarking" this using "ab" from a second host, running a command like
> ab -c 20 -n 10000 http://loki.ogre.com/lighttpd/cl-test.html
> Test 1: I disable Keep-Alive in lighttpd, adding a configuration like this to 
> /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf:
> server.max-keep-alive-requests = 0
> Test results are
> Requests per second:    9056.01 [#/sec] (mean)
> Time per request:       2.208 [ms] (mean)
> Time per request:       0.110 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
> Test 2: I enable Keep-Alive in lighttpd, with
> server.max-keep-alive-requests = 1000000
> Test results are:
> Requests per second:    4456.33 [#/sec] (mean)
> Time per request:       4.488 [ms] (mean)
> Time per request:       0.224 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
> This might not seem like a huge difference, but why would it be serving 2x 
> fewer QPS and 2x the latency with keep-alive to the origin server? If 
> anything, I'd expect it to be faster with keep-alive, right ? Shouldn't that 
> be noticeably less work?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to