[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992226#comment-12992226
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-524:
----------------------------------
The main difference is, I think, that other_ports takes some descriptive
information telling TS what it means. We'd have to merge that logic into the
server_port as well if we merged this. I'm gonna move this to to v3.1, unless
someone wants to work on this right now.
> Have a single directive for HTTP ports
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-524
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 2.1.3
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Marcus Clyne
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> Why have both
> proxy.config.http.server_port
> and
> proxy.config.http.server_other_ports
> as config options? Unless there is a good reason to have to options, it
> would probably be better to have a single config option.
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-523
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
