[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13424369#comment-13424369
]
James Peach commented on TS-1385:
---------------------------------
I'm using templates for gcc-comparible compilers because the type matching is
stricter. SunPro gets an overloaded function because it's a smaller change and
I can't test it.
> generic atomic operations API
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: TS-1385
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1385
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0
> Reporter: James Peach
> Assignee: James Peach
> Priority: Minor
>
> Rather than ink_atomic_increment32(), ink_atomic_increment64() and friends we
> should just have a generic ink_atomic_increment() that works for all the
> types we do atomic ops on. This is more reliable is cases where the size of a
> type varies between different systems (eg. time_t).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
