[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13586347#comment-13586347
]
Brian Geffon commented on TS-935:
---------------------------------
It's a bug, TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIATE will cause a segfault because
the event count goes negative. I'll look at it tomorrow when I'm up in portland.
> Should EVENT_INTERNAL really be the same as TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-935
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-935
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: TS API
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Assignee: Brian Geffon
> Fix For: 3.3.3
>
>
> When trying to use TSContCall with event = TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT I stumbled upon
> the fact that the API will decrement the event count for EVENT_INTERNAL or
> EVENT_IMMEDIATE (see INKContInternal::handle_event_count), but shouldn't we
> be able to do a TSContCall with TS_EVENT_IMMEDIAITE or TS_EVENT_TIMEOUT
> because as of now doing so would cause m_event_count to become -1 or
> shouldn't these defined values be something different?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
