[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14156749#comment-14156749
 ] 

Bryan Call commented on TS-3102:
--------------------------------

How long was the server running before the first memory dump was done in your 
comment above? It is using 4.5GB of ioBufAllocator[8] vs 751MB?  It seems like 
the sever has been running for awhile and wouldn't make a good comparison.

Do you have a patch you can attach to the bug?


> Reuse context memory for SPDY streams within a SPDY connection
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-3102
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3102
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPDY
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.1
>            Reporter: Sudheer Vinukonda
>            Assignee: Sudheer Vinukonda
>              Labels: yahoo
>             Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>
> In the present SPDY implementation in ATS, there is no client context reuse. 
> Though the spdy session is reused, each stream (even the non-concurrent ones) 
> is allocated a set of new/separate context buffers (including internal 
> plugin_vc, client_session, SM object, header heap, transaction buffers, 
> server session objects etc). Some of these objects are allocated from global 
> pool, while some are from per-thread pool. The context memory is not reused 
> unlike the non-spdy session, where there can be at most one transaction on a 
> given connection/session at a time.
> Besides being very inefficient (the allocation/deallocation) this also leads 
> to larger memory foot print over time, due to the relatively poor reuse of 
> per thread pool objects (especially, when there are a high number of threads 
> - e.g 100+ like we have).
> I am currently testing a patch that does not deallocate the streams when the 
> transaction completes and reuses those for new/subsequent streams.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to