[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14196962#comment-14196962
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-1264:
-----------------------------------
[~jplevyak] Now that CLFUS is both stable, and default, is there even a reason
to keep the old LRU cache? I.e. for v6.0.0, can we just nuke the LRU code?
> LRU RAM cache not accounting for overhead
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-1264
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1264
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Cache
> Affects Versions: 3.1.3
> Reporter: John Plevyak
> Assignee: John Plevyak
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 6.0.0
>
>
> The CLFUS RAM cache takes its overhead into account when determining how many
> bytes it is using. The LRU cache does not, which makes it hard to compare
> performance between the two and hard to correctly size the LRU RAM cache.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
