[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14278227#comment-14278227
 ] 

Zhao Yongming commented on TS-2482:
-----------------------------------

we have a patch that will fix the problem, I think. it works on turning ATS 
into a SOCSK5 server, but still pending to full testing with parent socks 
feature. the problem here is not only the assert, but also the HTTP 
transactions.

> Problems with SOCKS
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-2482
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2482
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Radim Kolar
>             Fix For: sometime
>
>
> There are several problems with using SOCKS. I am interested in case when TF 
> is sock client. Client sends HTTP request and TF uses SOCKS server to make 
> connection to internet.
> a/ - not documented enough in default configs
> From default configs comments it seems that for running 
> TF 4.1.2 as socks client, it is sufficient to add one line to socks.config:
> dest_ip=0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 parent="10.0.0.7:9050"
> but socks proxy is not used. If i run tcpdump sniffing packets  TF never 
> tries to connect to that SOCKS.
> From source code - 
> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/iocore/net/Socks.cc it 
> looks that is needed to set "proxy.config.socks.socks_needed" to activate 
> socks support. This should be documented in both sample files: socks.config 
> and record.config
> b/
> after enabling socks, i am hit by this assert:
> Assertion failed: (ats_is_ip4(&target_addr)), function init, file Socks.cc, 
> line 65.
> i run on dual stack system (ip4,ip6). 
> This code is setting default destination for SOCKS request? Can not you use 
> just 127.0.0.1 for case if client gets connected over IP6?
> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/iocore/net/Socks.cc#L66



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to