[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15200748#comment-15200748
 ] 

Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-3999:
-----------------------------------

Talked with [~amc] again, and I think we agreed that a solution allowing for 
both explicit, and implicit, self detection would be doable. Something like:

1) If explicitly given a self identifier, use that (this then requires a unique 
config file for each host in the cluster).

- otherwise- 

2) We do a heuristic, trying to use either the hostname or check the interface 
IPs, and compare that with the selected parent.

The heuristics would likely not cover every possible setup or environment, but 
we feel it could handle a good portion of common setups. For those where the 
heuristics can't work, the operator simply has to use the explicit self 
identification tagging.

> Add option to go direct for specific parent entry
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-3999
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3999
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Parent Proxy
>            Reporter: Alan M. Carroll
>            Assignee: Alan M. Carroll
>              Labels: A
>             Fix For: 7.0.0
>
>
> We want to use parenty proxying in a peer relationship so that a host can be 
> both a parent and child in general but only for a specific URL. Currently 
> this can be done using the CARP plugin but that can create some difficulties. 
> Being able to specify that one parent in the list is actually direct to 
> origin would make that much easier.
> The current suggestion is to overload the port specifier as a indicator of 
> direct. For example, if you had three hosts in a pod, {{rikku}}, {{tidus}}, 
> and {{yuna}}, then you would configure the parent proxying on {{tidus}} as
> {code}
> "tidus:@direct, yuna:8080, rikku:8080"
> {code}
> while the configuration on {{yuna}} would be
> {code}
> "tidus:8080, yuna:@direct, rikku:8080"
> {code}.
> Similarly for {{rikku}} the port would be changed to "@direct" just for the 
> "rikku" parent. I discussed several configuration options for this with 
> [~dcarlin] and putting the override directly in the parent list was his 
> preferred mechanism. Note that in order to have consistency between hosts in 
> a pod, the list of names *must* be exactly the same across all the peers. In 
> this case, it must be "tidus, yuna, rikku" for all three or loops will occur 
> because of different hash seeds.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to