[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15246317#comment-15246317
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TS-4180:
------------------------------------

GitHub user shinrich opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/578

    TS-4180: Support for multiple intermediate cert chains

    Previous fix parsed the comma separated file names, but would only load the 
first file.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/shinrich/trafficserver ts-4180

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/578.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #578
    
----
commit 25cde3c99f655781060639ca3038059622adbc77
Author: shinrich <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-04-18T18:50:29Z

    TS-4180: Support for multiple intermediate cert chains

----


> support for serving multiple intermediate cert chains
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-4180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4180
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SSL
>            Reporter: Scott Beardsley
>            Assignee: Susan Hinrichs
>              Labels: yahoo
>             Fix For: 6.2.0
>
>
> We would like to serve two different intermediate certificate chains for RSA 
> certs and ECDSA certs. Today they are required to be in the same chain. It 
> seems the best way would be to modify "ssl_ca_name" (or 
> proxy.config.ssl.CA.cert.path) to support a comma-delimited list of 
> intermediate files.
> Bonus points if ATS validates that the intermediate chain matches the cert 
> being served (and spits out an error if there is a mismatch)!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to