[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15257850#comment-15257850
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TS-4328:
------------------------------------

Github user sudheerv commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/554#issuecomment-214693606
  
    The problem is that you are trying to "mix" the internals of a completely 
independent/different feature to use for an unrelated/unintended purposes. This 
sets a bad precedent and makes the code harder to maintain.
    
    You are looking at one specific example where it seems to be conveniently 
doing what you need "right now" - but, just bcoz it seems to be satisfying the 
needs right now doesn't mean it will continue to do so in the future, since 
milestones is a different feature/function intended to do completely different 
things. If tomorrow someone changes milestone implementation which is not 
entirely unlikely, it affects the rest of the code  that depends on it so 
tightly because of its usage as "more" than milestones. Again, you might argue 
that when changing milestones one could also go ahead and change the rest of 
the code that "depends" on it. But, you now probably see the issue there? Think 
of people following the precedent set and start to randomly use milestones all 
over the place for various unrelated purposes. Milestones feature is no longer 
doing just milestones :) 


> Connect_retries re-connects even if request made it to origin (TS-3440 repeat)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-4328
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4328
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Thomas Jackson
>            Assignee: Thomas Jackson
>             Fix For: sometime
>
>
> I'm creating another issue as the root bug for TS-3440 can still be 
> reproduced if the origin is extremely slow (but no returns no error response).
> I've opened a PR (https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/554) which 
> reverts the original patch and instead checks if any bytes where sent.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to