[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15311340#comment-15311340
]
Thomas Jackson commented on TS-3959:
------------------------------------
Well, its a bit more complicated than that. We know exactly what the cause of
the issue is-- its the fix for the root issue linked (too aggressive of
retries). At this point we only have this one relatively small race condition
left. So at this point we can either just fix it-- or add in some hacky stuff
to workaround it for now. IMO in its current state the race that exists is very
small -- and we have a path forward to fix it (which isn't too bad from looking
at it a bit more), so i think we should leave it as is. Of course, we'll want
to get [~nickm] input on this-- as he is the reporter :)
> Dropped keep-alive connections not being re-established
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-3959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3959
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core, Network
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0
> Reporter: Nick Muerdter
> Assignee: Thomas Jackson
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: regression
> Fix For: 7.0.0
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-05-31 09-01-27.png,
> trafficserver-closed.png, trafficserver-reset.png
>
>
> I've observed some differences in how TrafficServer 6.0.0 behaves with
> connection retrying and outgoing keep-alive connections. I believe the
> changes in behavior might be related to this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3440
> I originally wasn't sure if this was a bug, but James Peach indicated it
> sounded more like a regression on the mailing list
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/trafficserver-users/201510.mbox/%[email protected]%3e).
> What I'm seeing in 6.0.0 is that if TrafficServer has some backend keep-alive
> connections already opened, but then one of the keep-alive connections is
> closed, the next request to TrafficServer may generate a 502 Server Hangup
> response when attempting to reuse that connection. Previously, I think
> TrafficServer was retrying when it encountered a closed keep-alive
> connection, but that is no longer the case. So if you have a backend that
> might unexpectedly close its open keep-alive connections, the only way I've
> found to completely prevent these 502 errors in 6.0.0 is to disable outgoing
> keepalive (proxy.config.http.keep_alive_enabled_out and
> proxy.config.http.keep_alive_post_out settings).
> For a slightly more concrete example of what can trigger this, this is fairly
> easy to reproduce with the following setup:
> - TrafficServer is proxying to nginx with outgoing keep-alive connections
> enabled (the default).
> - Throw a constant stream of requests at TrafficServer.
> - While that constant stream of requests is happening, also send a regular
> stream of SIGHUP commands to nginx to reload nginx.
> - Eventually you'll get some 502 Server Hangup responses from TrafficServer
> among your stream of requests.
> SIGHUPs in nginx should result in zero downtime for new requests, but I think
> what's happening is that TrafficServer may fail when an old keep-alived
> connection is reused (it's not common, so it depends on the timing of things
> and if the connection is from an old nginx worker that has since been shut
> down). In TrafficServer 5.3.1 these connection failures were retried, but in
> 6.0.0, no retries occur in this case.
> Here's some debug logs that show the difference in behavior between 6.0.0 and
> 5.3.1. Note that differences seem to stem from how each version eventually
> handles the "VC_EVENT_EOS" event following
> "&HttpSM::state_send_server_request_header, VC_EVENT_WRITE_COMPLETE".
> 5.3.1:
> https://gist.github.com/GUI/0c53a6c4fdc2782b14aa#file-trafficserver_5-3-1-log-L316
> 6.0.0:
> https://gist.github.com/GUI/0c53a6c4fdc2782b14aa#file-trafficserver_6-0-0-log-L314
> Interestingly, if I'm understand the log files correctly, it looks like
> TraffficServer is reporting an odd empty response from these connections
> ("HTTP/0.9 0" in 5.3.1 and "HTTP/1.0 0" in 6.0.0). However, as far as I can
> tell from TCP dumps on the system, nginx is not actually sending any form of
> response.
> In these example cases the backend server isn't sending back any data (at
> least as far as I can tell), so from what I understand (and the logic
> outlined in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3440), it should be safe
> to retry.
> Let me know if I can provide any other details. Or if exact scripts to
> reproduce the issues against the example nginx backend I described above
> would be useful, I could get that together.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
