[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15421296#comment-15421296
]
James Peach commented on TS-795:
--------------------------------
FWIW I have a partial patch for this. It was surprisingly invasive.
> Clean up definitions and usage of buffer size indexes vs buffer sizes
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TS-795
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-795
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
> Fix For: sometime
>
>
> Right now, we have a set of defines, and APIs, which can take either a
> "index" to a size (used e.g. for an allocator index), or a real size. Both of
> these are currently int64_t in all APIs and member variables, and in the
> implementations, the usage are sometimes overloaded (i.e. we do "size"
> calculations on top of the indexes, making for real confusing code).
> There's also a lack of proper identification of what is an "size index" type
> (or parameter), and what is a "size". This makes for risky code.
> I think we should clean up all the implementations and APIs, as follow
> 1) Make proper names of all APIs and macros, clearly indicating if it's
> working on a size index or a size.
> 2) Keep only the size types, parameters and macros using int64_t. Do not
> overload "real" size over the size indexes.
> 3) We either make the size indexes an "int" (or even a short), or perhaps
> even better an enum (like below). All APIs, parameters, and member variables
> that refer to such size indexes would use this appropriate type.
> {code}
> enum BufferSizeIndex {
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_128 = 0,
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_256, /* 1 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_512, /* 2 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_1K, /* 3 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_2K, /* 4 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_4K, /* 5 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_8K, /* 6 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_16K, /* 7 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_32K, /* 8 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_64K, /* 9 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_128K, /* 10 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_256K, /* 11 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_512K, /* 12 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_1M, /* 13 */
> BUFFER_SIZE_INDEX_2M, /* 14 */
> /* These have special semantics */
> BUFFER_SIZE_NOT_ALLOCATED,
> };
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
