Thomas Jackson created TS-4796:
----------------------------------

             Summary: ATS not closing origin connections on first RST from 
client
                 Key: TS-4796
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4796
             Project: Traffic Server
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: HTTP
            Reporter: Thomas Jackson


As a continuation of TS-4720, while testing that the session is closed when we 
expect-- I found that it isn't.

Although we are now closing the sessions, we aren't doing it as quickly as we 
should. In this client abort case we expect the client to abort, and ATS should 
initially continue to send bytes to the client-- as we are in the half-open 
state. After the first set of bytes are sent to the client-- the client will 
send an RST-- which should signal ATS to stop sending the request (and tear 
down the origin connection etc.).

I'm able to reproduce this locally, and the debug output (with some additional 
comments) looks like below:

{code}
< FIN FROM CLIENT >
[Aug 29 18:25:07.491] Server {0x7effa538a800} DEBUG: <HttpSM.cc:2649 
(main_handler)> (http) [0] [HttpSM::main_handler, VC_EVENT_EOS]
[Aug 29 18:25:07.491] Server {0x7effa538a800} DEBUG: <HttpSM.cc:892 
(state_watch_for_client_abort)> (http) [0] 
[&HttpSM::state_watch_for_client_abort, VC_EVENT_EOS]



< RST FROM CLIENT >
Got an HttpTunnel event 100 
[Aug 29 18:25:13.062] Server {0x7effa538a800} DEBUG: <HttpTunnel.cc:1173 
(producer_handler)> (http_tunnel) [0] producer_handler [http server 
VC_EVENT_READ_READY]
[Aug 29 18:25:13.062] Server {0x7effa538a800} DEBUG: <HttpTunnel.cc:1108 
(producer_handler_chunked)> (http_tunnel) [0] producer_handler_chunked [http 
server VC_EVENT_READ_READY]
[Aug 29 18:25:13.062] Server {0x7effa538a800} DEBUG: <HttpTunnel.cc:203 
(read_size)> (http_chunk) read chunk size of 15 bytes
[Aug 29 18:25:13.062] Server {0x7effa538a800} DEBUG: <HttpTunnel.cc:279 
(read_chunk)> (http_chunk) completed read of chunk of 15 bytes
[Aug 29 18:25:13.062] Server {0x7effa538a800} DEBUG: <HttpTunnel.cc:1213 
(producer_handler)> (http_redirect) [HttpTunnel::producer_handler] 
enable_redirection: [1 0 0] event: 100
Got an HttpTunnel event 101 
[Aug 29 18:25:13.062] Server {0x7effa538a800} DEBUG: <HttpTunnel.cc:1373 
(consumer_handler)> (http_tunnel) [0] consumer_handler [user agent 
VC_EVENT_WRITE_READY]
write ready consumer_handler

{code}


In this situation the connection doesn't close here at the RST-- but rather on 
the next set of bytes from the origin to send-- which end up tripping a 
VC_EVENT_ERROR-- and tearing down the connection.

When the client sends the first RST epoll returns a WRITE_READY event -- which 
the HTTPTunnel consumer ignores completely. It seems then that when we recieve 
the WRITE_READY event we need to determine if we are already in the writing 
state-- and if so, then we should stop the transaction (since we are already 
edge-triggered).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to