[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4879?focusedWorklogId=29367&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-29367
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on TS-4879:
--------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 20/Sep/16 03:45
            Start Date: 20/Sep/16 03:45
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: Github user oknet commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1033
  
    @jpeach , There is a similar bug in NetAccept::do_blocking_accept() which 
belongs to ACCEPT side instead of CONNECT side. Should I combine them together 
in one commit or 2 commits respectively ?


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 29367)
    Time Spent: 2.5h  (was: 2h 20m)

> NetVC leaks while hyper emergency occur on check_emergency_throttle()
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-4879
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4879
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Oknet Xu
>            Assignee: Oknet Xu
>          Time Spent: 2.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The con could be closed if hyper emergency occur on 
> check_emergency_throttle().
> But we did not check the con.fd while we get return from 
> check_emergency_throttle().
> For hyper emergency:
> - The socket fd is removed from epoll while it is closed.
> - A NetVC with a closed socket fd is created and callback NET_EVENT_OPEN to 
> SM.
> Thus:
> - The NetVC will never triggered by NetHandler.
> - Only InactivityCop could handle the NetVC and the default timeout value is 
> 86400 secs.
> For the counter: net_connections_currently_open_stat
> - It is increased in “connect_re_internal()”
> - It isn't decreased while the con.fd set to NO_FD due to hyper emergency 
> - Because it is decreased in close_UnixNetVConnection() only con.fd != NO_FD. 
> (TS-4178)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to