[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16315565#comment-16315565
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TRAFODION-2888:
-------------------------------------------

GitHub user selvaganesang opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/trafodion/pull/1376

    [TRAFODION-2888] Streamline setjmp/longjmp concepts in Trafodion

    First set of changes to streamline setjmp/longjmp.
       a) Removed the setjmp in heap management within Trafodion.
       b) Removed obsolete code related to No-wait operation concepts in SQL

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/selvaganesang/trafodion longjmp

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/trafodion/pull/1376.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1376
    
----
commit 6b6cbf93f9d51a3d605695d1f1c5f9a6c40e4578
Author: selvaganesang <selva.ganesan93@...>
Date:   2018-01-08T01:31:05Z

    [TRAFODION-2888] Streamline setjmp/longjmp concepts in Trafodion
    
    First set of changes to streamline setjmp/longjmp.
       a) Removed the setjmp in heap management within Trafodion.
       b) Removed obsolete code related to No-wait operation concepts in SQL

----


> Streamline setjmp/longjmp concepts in Trafodion
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TRAFODION-2888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2888
>             Project: Apache Trafodion
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sql-general
>            Reporter: Selvaganesan Govindarajan
>            Assignee: Selvaganesan Govindarajan
>             Fix For: 2.3
>
>
> I happened to come across a core dump with longjmp in executor layer that 
> brought down the node. Unfortunately, the core dump wasn’t useful to figure 
> out what was the root cause for the longjmp.  Hence,
> a)    I wonder is there a way to figure out what caused longjmp from the core?
> b)    If no, why do longjmp? It might be better to let it dump naturally by 
> accessing the invalid address or null pointer right at the point of failure. 
> Was longjmp put in place in legacy Trafodion code base to avoid node being 
> brought down when the privilege code gets into segment violation?
> If a) is not possible, I would want to remove the remnants of setjmp and 
> longjmp from the code to enable us to debug the issue better.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to