[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Wayne Birdsall resolved TRAFODION-2037.
---------------------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.1-incubating

> Improve DDL concurrency
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: TRAFODION-2037
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRAFODION-2037
>             Project: Apache Trafodion
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sql-cmu
>    Affects Versions: 2.1-incubating
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: David Wayne Birdsall
>            Assignee: David Wayne Birdsall
>             Fix For: 2.1-incubating
>
>
> In CmpSeabaseDDL::getSeabaseUserTableDesc 
> (core/sql/sqlcomp/CmpSeabaseDDLtable.cpp), the code executes the following 
> query:
> select trim(O.catalog_name || '.' || '\"' || O.schema_name || '\"' || '.' || 
> '\"' || O.object_name || '\"' ) constr_name, trim(O2.catalog_name || '.' || 
> '\"' || O2.schema_name || '\"' || '.' || '\"' || O2.object_name || '\"' ) 
> table_name from %s.\"%s\".%s U, %s.\"%s\".%s O, %s.\"%s\".%s O2, %s.\"%s\".%s 
> T where O.object_uid = U.foreign_constraint_uid and O2.object_uid = 
> T.table_uid and T.constraint_uid = U.foreign_constraint_uid and 
> U.unique_constraint_uid = %Ld order by 2, 1
> The plan for this query does a full scan of TABLE_CONSTRAINTS, and joins that 
> to OBJECTS_UNIQ_IDX. So all rows of TABLE_CONSTRAINTS are read, and many if 
> not most rows of OBJECTS_UNIQ_IDX.
> Analyzing the query plan, the full scan is inherent. The only known 
> information we have for TABLE_CONSTRAINTS is CONSTRAINT_UID, which is the 
> second column of the key. The first column has high UEC so MDAM is not a 
> possibility.
> Creating this large read set conflicts with many write transactions to 
> metadata, decreasing DDL concurrency.
> As an experiment, I added an index to the metadata on 
> TABLE_CONSTRAINTS(CONSTRAINT_UID). I found I had to add a CQS as well to 
> force it to avoid a full scan. With this change, I found that DDL concurrency 
> was much improved. So, the proposal in this JIRA is to add this index and CQS.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to