To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 13:29:54 +0000 2007 ------- Shocking! This issue dates Fri Aug 29 19:44:00 2003 2003! Four years later, apparently OO.o developers still don't understand the SKIN is what gives M$ Office the advantage. This shouldn't be P5 but P1 !!! It's the first thing users see. I have some work stations with OO.o 2.2 - and all remarks I get on them are alike... "We can't work with this 'old kind of MS Office'" As far as I'm concerned OO.o development should be 100% "skinnability" next week. It's like bytetraveler wrote in 2005 (!!!!!): "I can't "convert" a single co-worker if they start laughing the moment one of the apps loads" MAYDAY! MAYDAY! OO.o DEVELOPMENT TEAM: READ THIS! The LOOKS of your program are so much more important than how it works! M$ is the best proof of this. Microsoft now made a huge mistake adapting their file formats (doc -> docx, xls -> xlsx, ...) It's time to get people using "good looking OO.o" --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
