[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17495871#comment-17495871
]
Weiwei Yang commented on YUNIKORN-725:
--------------------------------------
Thanks [~srisco], [~wilfreds]. Sorry for the late response, I was on vacation.
I don't have much experience with the cross-compiling stuff, it looks like
there are 2 options, docker buildx, and docker manifest. The buildx approach
looks so much easier, why do you prefer the manifest approach [~wilfreds]?
Except for the build script changes, how can we make sure the image we built is
working well on arm64 hosts? As far as I can tell, github action doesn't
support arm64 which means we won't be able to have automated tests for that. I
am not sure what is the best practice for this, any suggestions?
> Support arm64
> -------------
>
> Key: YUNIKORN-725
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-725
> Project: Apache YuniKorn
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: release
> Reporter: Holden Karau
> Priority: Major
>
> It would be good to support arm64, this is probably not too painful and can
> be done by swapping docker build with docker buildx, but there's often edge
> cases where some code changes are needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@yunikorn.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@yunikorn.apache.org
