[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Qi Zhu updated YUNIKORN-2156:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
Try to improve the case, Spark Dynamic Allocation when we enable gang 
scheduling:
If we can add some improvements to this case? Such as: * For preemption case:

 # 
 ** lower priority for anything more than the gang and thus get them killed 
earlier than when they do not belong to a gang

 * For quota hit:

 # 
 ** For normal gang scheduling, we will reject jobs with total gang size > quota
 ** But for dynamic allocations, if we can add monitor logic to monitor the 
exceeded resource allocations for those jobs?

 # 
 ## 
 *** We may extend the quota some value when it happens.

> Improvement for gang scheduling when spark dynamic allocation enabled
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YUNIKORN-2156
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-2156
>             Project: Apache YuniKorn
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core - scheduler
>            Reporter: Qi Zhu
>            Priority: Major
>
> Try to improve the case, Spark Dynamic Allocation when we enable gang 
> scheduling:
> If we can add some improvements to this case? Such as: * For preemption case:
>  # 
>  ** lower priority for anything more than the gang and thus get them killed 
> earlier than when they do not belong to a gang
>  * For quota hit:
>  # 
>  ** For normal gang scheduling, we will reject jobs with total gang size > 
> quota
>  ** But for dynamic allocations, if we can add monitor logic to monitor the 
> exceeded resource allocations for those jobs?
>  # 
>  ## 
>  *** We may extend the quota some value when it happens.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to