[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17003362#comment-17003362
]
Jordan Zimmerman edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-102 at 12/25/19 6:53 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is an overview document describing details, options, background, etc. for
replacing Jute in ZooKeeper - please distribute far and wide and let's get a
good discussion going.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wP61nCDeLLNPdXGxHxi_MIbt7c2pCl0ttm9KMjyOisQ/edit?usp=sharing
was (Author: randgalt):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wP61nCDeLLNPdXGxHxi_MIbt7c2pCl0ttm9KMjyOisQ/edit?usp=sharing
> Need to replace Jute with supported code
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-102
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-102
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Benjamin Reed
> Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.0.0
>
>
> ZooKeeper currently uses Jute to serialize objects to put on the wire and on
> disk. We pulled Jute out of Hadoop and added a C binding. Both versions of
> Jute have evolved (although Hadoop still doesn't have a C binding). It would
> be nice to use a more standard serialization library. Some options include
> Thrift or Google's protocol buffers.
> Our main requirements would be Java and C bindings and good performance. (For
> example, serializing to XML would give us incredibly bad performance and
> would not be acceptible!)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
