[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Enrico Olivelli reassigned ZOOKEEPER-837:
-----------------------------------------
Assignee: Zili Chen (was: Thomas Koch)
> cyclic dependency ClientCnxn, ZooKeeper
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-837
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: java client
> Affects Versions: 3.3.1
> Reporter: Patrick Datko
> Assignee: Zili Chen
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 3.7.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-837.patch, ZOOKEEPER-837.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-837.patch, ZOOKEEPER-837.patch, ZOOKEEPER-837.patch
>
> Time Spent: 7.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> ZooKeeper instantiates ClientCnxn in its ctor with this and therefor builds a
> cyclic dependency graph between both objects. This means, you can't have the
> one without the other. So why did you bother do make them to separate classes
> in the first place?
> ClientCnxn accesses ZooKeeper.state. State should rather be a property of
> ClientCnxn. And ClientCnxn accesses zooKeeper.get???Watches() in its method
> primeConnection(). I've not yet checked, how this dependency should be
> resolved better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
