[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Damien Diederen resolved ZOOKEEPER-3990.
----------------------------------------
      Assignee: Damien Diederen
    Resolution: Duplicate

Thank you for the report, [~kotlasaicharanreddy]. The rationale, from 
[{{owaspSuppressions.xml}}|https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/5b034a4362e41a62da43979ad0fb6c97477c1624/owaspSuppressions.xml#L44-L48]
 and the linked ZOOKEEPER-3677, is that we don't use that part of Log4j, and 
that nobody has taken care of the switch so far. See [this 
email|https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/zookeeper-dev/202010.mbox/%3CCADKUBPi60YyZXWdKhBk-HFOAkGkyLV9MGGww2QCgr1bqfG9gWQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E]
 and the rest of the thread as well as ZOOKEEPER-2342 for more context.

> Log4j 1.2.17 used by zookeeper 3.6.1 is vulnerable to CVE-2019-17571
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-3990
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3990
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.1, 3.6.2
>            Reporter: SAICHARAN REDDY KOTLA
>            Assignee: Damien Diederen
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hello everyone,
> I work for a product which uses apache/zookeeper 3.6.1.  We scanned our 
> product with a security scanner which reported CVE-2019-17571. 
> After analysis we found that this vulnerability is coming from zookeeper 
> 3.6.1 because of direct dependency on log4j 1.2.17. 
> Statement regarding 1.x version of log4j from [official 
> |http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/] site:
> {quote}A security vulnerability, CVE-2019-17571 has been identified against 
> Log4j 1. Log4j includes a SocketServer that accepts serialized log events and 
> deserializes them without verifying whether the objects are allowed or not. 
> This can provide an attack vector that can be expoited. Since Log4j 1 is no 
> longer maintained this issue will not be fixed. Users are urged to upgrade to 
> Log4j 2.x
> {quote}
> Could you please share your rationale on not upgrading log4j to 2.x



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to