[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

krystal he updated ZOOKEEPER-4681:
----------------------------------
    Description: 
Using a [tool|https://github.com/kry4tall/CC-ZOO358] that I modifyed from 
[Filip Niksic's zootester|https://github.com/fniksic/zootester] for testing 
ZooKeeper, I discovered the following scenario which causes uncommitted 
requests to be executed.

Zab protocol has three rounds: PROPOSE, ACK, and COMMIT. My tool can isolate 
the PROPOSAL, ACK and COMMIT messages and collect the values of some variables 
of each server at the end of each round.

Initially, start an ensemble with 3 servers called A, B, and C, and initialize 
2 znodes called /key0 and /key1, and set them to 0 and 1 respectively.
 # Request to set /key0 to 1000 on 3 servers.
 # Isolate the ack messages of 2 servers.
 # Request to set /key0 to 1001 on 3 servers.
 # Stop all servers and restart them.
 # Check the contents of /key0 and /key1. Surprisingly, both requests 
worked,reading /key0 == 1000, /key1 == 1001 from all servers or several of them.

If we skip step 4, we may read "/key0 == null, /key1 == null" from A and B, and 
read "/key0 == 0, /key1 == 1001" from C. Value null is because the 
"ConnectionLoss" with znodes.

Repeat the scenario above may get different results.

However, 1000 and 1001 should not appear in any znode, because the proposal of 
the first request cannot obtain enough ack, it cannot be committed. And servers 
will also not commit the proposal of the second request, because there is a 
proposal that has not been committed before, according to the source code of 
Zookeeper, 

  was:
Using a [tool|https://github.com/kry4tall/CC-ZOO358] that I modifyed from 
[Filip Niksic's zootester|https://github.com/fniksic/zootester] for testing 
ZooKeeper, I discovered the following scenario which causes uncommitted 
requests to be executed.

Zab protocol has three rounds: PROPOSE, ACK, and COMMIT. My tool can isolate 
the PROPOSAL, ACK and COMMIT messages and collect the values of some variables 
of each server at the end of each round.

Initially, start an ensemble with 3 servers called A, B, and C, and initialize 
2 znodes called /key0 and /key1, and set them to 0 and 1 respectively.
 # Request to set /key0 to 1000 on 3 servers.
 # Isolate the ack messages of 2 servers.
 # Request to set /key0 to 1001 on 3 servers.
 # Stop all servers and restart them.
 # Check the contents of /key0 and /key1. Surprisingly, both requests 
worked,reading /key0 == 1000, /key1 == 1001 from all servers or several of them.

If we skip step 4, we may read "/key0 == null, /key1 == null" from A and B, and 
read "/key0 == 0, /key1 == 1001" from C. Value null is because the 
"ConnectionLoss" with znodes.

Repeat the scenario above may get different results.

However, 1000 and 1001 should not appear in any znode, because the proposal of 
the first request cannot obtain enough ack, it cannot be committed. According 
to the source code of Zookeeper, the server will not commit the proposal of the 
second request, because there is a proposal that has not been committed before.


> Uncommitted requests  have been executed
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-4681
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4681
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: quorum
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.8
>            Reporter: krystal he
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: no-restart.patch, restart-all-server.patch
>
>
> Using a [tool|https://github.com/kry4tall/CC-ZOO358] that I modifyed from 
> [Filip Niksic's zootester|https://github.com/fniksic/zootester] for testing 
> ZooKeeper, I discovered the following scenario which causes uncommitted 
> requests to be executed.
> Zab protocol has three rounds: PROPOSE, ACK, and COMMIT. My tool can isolate 
> the PROPOSAL, ACK and COMMIT messages and collect the values of some 
> variables of each server at the end of each round.
> Initially, start an ensemble with 3 servers called A, B, and C, and 
> initialize 2 znodes called /key0 and /key1, and set them to 0 and 1 
> respectively.
>  # Request to set /key0 to 1000 on 3 servers.
>  # Isolate the ack messages of 2 servers.
>  # Request to set /key0 to 1001 on 3 servers.
>  # Stop all servers and restart them.
>  # Check the contents of /key0 and /key1. Surprisingly, both requests 
> worked,reading /key0 == 1000, /key1 == 1001 from all servers or several of 
> them.
> If we skip step 4, we may read "/key0 == null, /key1 == null" from A and B, 
> and read "/key0 == 0, /key1 == 1001" from C. Value null is because the 
> "ConnectionLoss" with znodes.
> Repeat the scenario above may get different results.
> However, 1000 and 1001 should not appear in any znode, because the proposal 
> of the first request cannot obtain enough ack, it cannot be committed. And 
> servers will also not commit the proposal of the second request, because 
> there is a proposal that has not been committed before, according to the 
> source code of Zookeeper, 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to