On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:29:28AM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > thanks, no segfaults anymore and valgrind is happy, too. > good
> Btw., I'm planning to do some compatibility tests with the old isync > 0.9.2 from Debian Sid and the current CVS version, to get a newer > package into Debian (hopefully for for Etch). Do you see any chance to > make a new release based on the current CVS version, or should I focus > on isync 1.0.2? > i'd say stay with 1.0.x. the async stuff in HEAD is half-finished, so it doesn't buy the user a whole lot but potentially destabilizes things (s.a.). i don't expect HEAD to be incompatible to 1.0.x in any way. you might want to check that i backported all isync wrapper fixes (and whether i made a realease). -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
