On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:06:49AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 08:03:53PM +0200, Mark Pustjens wrote:
> > According to the manual on the option CertificateFile:
> > ``Directly matched peer certificates are always trusted, regardless of 
> > validity.''
> > 
> > However, I still get the error ``certificate owner does not match 
> > hostname''. The error is right in that the domain of the certificate does 
> > not match the Host domain in the configuration. It is wrong in that 
> > according to the manual, this check should have passed.
> > 
> > The attached patch adds an option CertificateDomain, which is used to 
> > match against the certificate. Given the manual, this might not be 
> > intended.
> > 
> > What is the intended behaviour, and what would be the preferred way to 
> > solve it?
> > 
> i need to research this myself. thanks for the report.
> 
mbsync should skip the subject verification.
and it actually tries to do that: socket.c:161
i have no clue what went wrong. try openssl s_client -verbose [...]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel

Reply via email to