It's not that there is "no support", it's just that one of the earliest troubleshooting steps is to check wheather the problem still exists in the latest version.
> On 31 Aug 2015, at 10:40 PM, Paul van der Vlis <p...@vandervlis.nl> wrote: > > Op 30-08-15 om 21:03 schreef Oswald Buddenhagen: >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 06:16:01PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >>> Op 30-08-15 om 17:16 schreef Oswald Buddenhagen: >>>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 04:02:44PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >>>>> isync 1.1.1 >>>>> >>>>> I am using mbsync from Debian stable. >>>>> >>>> right, forget the other instructions. >>>> try a more current mbsync version. >>> >>> I prefer using official Debian packages. I like it when software is >>> 'checked' by a third party like Debian. Is Isync 1.1.1 not usuable and >>> bad? >>> >> i'm saying i'm not going to bother debugging non-obvious problems with >> an outdated release. > > It's a pity that there seems to be no support from upstream for the > version in Debian stable. > > I have tried version 1.1.2 on another machine, but it has the same problems. > > Did you ever see version 1.1.1 or 1.1.2 working with a IMAP-to-IMAP > synchronisation? I only see examples for IMAP-to-Maildir. > > With regards, > Paul van der Vlis. > > > > -- > Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen > https://www.vandervlis.nl/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > isync-devel mailing list > isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
