On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:18:33AM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:54:29PM -0300, Raphaël wrote:
> > - Why mbsync .uidvalidity file does not contain the value that > > OfflineIMAP calls folder UIDVALIDITY? > > > i presume offlineimap forces the remote uid scheme onto the local store, > so it has only one set of uidvalidity and uids. mbsync enumerates the > local store separately, so it has two sets which need to be mapped. This is the same here. Both (UIDs and UIDVALIDITY) are internally mapped using the mailbox name. > it wouldn't be too useful to make the state files compatible, as a > migration like you're attempting is quite uncommon (though admittedly > one of the most common questions on this list). I disagree. I guess that more compatibility would be usefull for enough users to worth it. :-) > having a standardized format for the maildir extensions otoh would > certainly be a win, because MUAs could make good use of it. i just saw > in the list archive that offlineimap is getting support for imap > keywords, and it would be really helpful to have a single format for > that. If someone is interested in implementing such format in OfflineIMAP, I'm all for this. On my side, I can make this available in imapfw while this task would need to be postponed since imapfw is not ready yet. BTW, if nobody raises to make OfflineIMAP support a standardized format I think I'll come back in order to raise this topic again. A well-documented and standardized format looks like a great idea. -- Nicolas Sebrecht ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
