On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 01:47:26PM +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov wrote: > It may be VERY useful in context of adding timer for read(). > Blocking read() without timer may be considered as a bug. > Mbsync can hang on read() due to network failure, such situation > was observed many times, really. > that's already implemented on master. i guess i should make a release, as it's not looking like i'm going to do substantial work on mbsync anytime soon ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
