On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:41:39AM -0400, myg...@gmail.com wrote: > On 05/08/2018 at 09:35 Oswald Buddenhagen writes: > > the whole *point* of the tuid is that it is random, so even duplicated > > messages (which you could produce with your MUA) are reliably > > propagated. > > This sounds like a "corner case" that is not important to me. > until you lose data because of it. ;)
> I think I would rather have the files in my local Maildir be identical > to Gmail files. > that in itself doesn't appear to be a worthwhile goal; it's normal for the various agents along the mail transfer to add headers. > IIUC, they now differ by the addition of the X-TUID. Is that > correct? > yes > Is X-TUID central to the isync design? Could the option to turn it off > (at the risk of duplicates not being propagated) be easily added? > downloads from gmail could make use of the x-gm-msgid header; that one would be reliable. everything else can use message-id in as far as present and hopefully unique. patches welcome. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
