On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 02:10:56PM +0200, Kristian Larsson wrote: > Is this something you would consider including in mbsync? If not, > why? Can an alternative design be made? > the patch is a monumental hack given the purpose, so rejected. but the underlying idea is actually more in line with my own thinking than yuri's patch. see https://sourceforge.net/p/isync/mailman/message/35620423/ , https://sourceforge.net/p/isync/mailman/isync-devel/thread/878tp3hm7x.fsf%40wavexx.thregr.org/#msg35673594 ff., and https://sourceforge.net/p/isync/feature-requests/8/ .
_______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
