On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 03:14:37AM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:12:58PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > yes, it should. but i seem to remember that someone pointed out that it > > doesn't happen in certain scenarios. are you running a full sync? > > what's your config+command line? > > Sync New ReNew Flags > ah, there: you're not syncing deletions. that explains why the conflict persists. i suppose it would make sense to simply suppress the message in this case, even though technically it *is* entirely correct: it can't sync over the flag change due to the target being gone.
> '-d' option gave good details but not related to the conflict. > well, as i said, it gave you the necessary context which allows you to infer what happened: the master's load_box returns a list of messages where the pair's first uid is missing (or the other way round). > Moreover I have stated to get socket error as well now: > > Socket error on imap.gmail.com (74.125.68.109:993): timeout. > does that happen only when running with the -D options? that would be weird. otherwise, maybe your network route to google is just borderline insufficient. just keep restarting - as long as *some* progress is actually made some times, it will finish at some point. _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
