On 2021-12-13 18:21:51, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via isync-devel wrote: > On 13 Dec 2021, at 17:49, Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de> > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:26:13PM +0000, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via > > isync-devel wrote: > >> Not that I would wish to prejudice the author(s) of imapsync, another paid > >> tool for IMAP migration, but what would it take for mbsync, whose > >> interface and configuration I much prefer, to be usable for one-way syncs > >> in the fashion of imapsync? > > > > that depends on what exactly is missing from your perspective. > > One-way (possibly stateless) sync, with optional deletion of messages from > the source, with optional removal of empty folders. I am aware that this can > be implemented with a multi-stage process, but imapsync does it rather better > for this particular use case (maintain a relationship with an existing > provider, while making the transition to a self-hosted server or another > provider) by maintaining a locally-hosted copy of what would be stored on the > source at the destination.
What's the difference between this and "Expunge None"? Without expunging the messages, they will be physically present, but marked as deleted, correct? _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
